Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 13:54
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What bait should you use for ocean fishing?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Pain relief breakthrough as scientists discover a safer, non-addictive approach - Earth.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Dozens of Israeli children develop malignant tumors from sperm donor - The Jerusalem Post
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What trains transport cars and passengers near Pompano Beach, Florida that goes to New York?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
How to Make AI Faster and Smarter—With a Little Help from Physics - WIRED
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Americans Could See Electric Bills Jump 4% in the Summer Heat - PYMNTS.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
After 6 new cases over the weekend, North Dakota has nation's highest measles rate - InForum